In Hockin & Ors v Marsden & Ors  EWHC 763 (Ch) the High Court held that it would unfairly prejudice a company’s creditors if the company’s mis-selling claim against a bank were not assigned by its administrators to a creditor to pursue.
In the particular circumstances of this case, the mis-selling claim could only be made good with reliance on evidence provided by the directors of the company. As a result, the administrators did not want to pursue the claim however the directors of the company did. The two directors made an application to Court for an order to direct the administrators to assign the mis-selling claim to them.
The application was brought pursuant to paragraph 74 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986, however an application under this paragraph can only be invoked by a creditor or a member of the company. Neither director was a member of the company and only one of them was a creditor.
The Court held that the administrators’ decision not to pursue the mis-selling claim was not unreasonable, however the real question was whether it was justifiable not to assign the claim. The Judge held that in the circumstances the ‘directors would have nothing to lose and the administrators would be spending creditors’ money on the costs’, and so it was held that it would unfairly harm the company’s creditors if the claim against the bank were not assigned to a creditor to pursue.
If you have any questions please contact our Corporate Recovery and Insolvency Team.
Disclaimer: Anything posted on this blog is for general information only and is not intended to provide legal advice on any general or specific matter. Please refer to our terms and conditions for further information. Please contact the author of the blog if you would like to discuss the issues raised.